![]() |
[PROBLEM] Please test: KCRW stream? - Printable Version +- Moode Forum (https://moodeaudio.org/forum) +-- Forum: moOde audio player (https://moodeaudio.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Support (https://moodeaudio.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: [PROBLEM] Please test: KCRW stream? (/showthread.php?tid=7791) |
Please test: KCRW stream? - PJVervoorn - 06-06-2025 Hi, In my current setup (9.3.5 on a 3A+, with a FIIO dac) KCRW’s stream starts stuttering after some time and finally stops playing. ’some time’ can be anywhere from a few seconds up to an hour. Can someone test if that happens for them too, and if it is worthy of investigation by Tim. The reward for trying is great music ![]() The stream: https://streams.kcrw.com/e24_mp3 (update: other streams, like Radio Paradise & FluxFM don’t have issues) RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - TheOldPresbyope - 06-06-2025 (06-06-2025, 02:40 PM)PJVervoorn Wrote: Hi, radio-browser.info says the KCRW MP3 stream is only 56kbps. I haven't tried it. Instead, I've been listening to their 256kbps AAC stream for 5 minutes now with no issues. I'll keep it up for a hour. ETA - the AAC stream is https://streams.kcrw.com/e24_aac So many stations, so little time. Regards, Kent FYI - I'm located on the east coast of the US. RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - TheOldPresbyope - 06-06-2025 @PJVervoorn Update: I went away and came back to find the AAC stream is still playing after 3 hours. If there were glitches I wasn't around to hear them. Appended is a cover image I created from a PNG image I grabbed from the station website, manipulated with ImageMagick to square it up to 600x600 and add a black background, then to convert it to JPG. Not elegant but serviceable. Regards, Kent RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - Klangraum - 06-06-2025 (06-06-2025, 02:40 PM)PJVervoorn Wrote: Hi, no issues on my end with the aac stream (not a long test env. a bit more than a hour) got this Picture from the Site RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - TheOldPresbyope - 06-06-2025 (06-06-2025, 08:09 PM)Klangraum Wrote:(06-06-2025, 02:40 PM)PJVervoorn Wrote: Hi, Woof! I missed that; much better than my plain-jane image. Regards, Kent RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - PJVervoorn - 06-06-2025 Thanks for looking. For me both the MP3 and AAC version exhibit the same stuttering ![]() (AAC reports 16 bit, 256 kbps, MP3 24 bit, 192 kbps.) I also tried the ‘regular’ program and that also starts stuttering and stops. I see this in the logs: 2025-06-06T23:05:15 alsa_output: Decoder is too slow; playing silence to avoid xrun … repeated several times 2025-06-06T23:06:27 alsa_output: Decoder is too slow; playing silence to avoid xrun 2025-06-06T23:06:28 player: played "https://streams.kcrw.com/e24_aac" Searching for that text leads me back to the monitor option of moode. Trying that now... RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - TheOldPresbyope - 06-06-2025 (06-06-2025, 09:24 PM)PJVervoorn Wrote: Thanks for looking. The decoder message suggests Internet congestion or somesuch between them and you ![]() Regards, Kent RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - PJVervoorn - 06-07-2025 Looked further into this, with help from ChatGPT: Quote:why is my traffic routed to South Africa? Quote:Your traffic is being routed to South Africa most likely because of how the destination IP address (66.85.89.38) is hosted and advertised via BGP. I already tried a different DNS provider, but that resolved to the same IP. So, I will try the last bullet: use NordVPN to create a link with the US and add a route to direct traffic to 66.85.89.38 via that link. RE: Please test: KCRW stream? - TheOldPresbyope - 06-07-2025 @PJVervoorn Since I wasn't having problems I didn't trace the route. Now I have. It takes 21 hops from my player, Almost a third of them are within my ISP's domain. On the 9th hop I hit a server in Ashburn Virginia---the center of the Internet-verse---which is only 30 some miles away as the crow flies! It hops around some more until finally hitting the final three IPs that your trace did. So, yeah, even for me, a South African host seems to be the end of the line. The only thing I notice is that your output shows slower return times for them, almost twice as long. That, by itself, isn't any kind of smoking gun. Good luck. Regards, Kent |